ERP overlays across a portfolio
Modernisations delivered as overlays across an application portfolio with no business freeze windows. Every cutover ran during normal hours, gated by automated reconciliation and backed by rehearsed rollback.
EDRMS, CRM/ERP, D365 and third-party API integration, with legacy modernisation that avoids risky rewrites. Delivered by named senior engineers, fixed scope, staging from week one.
Epcotec connects and modernises the systems Australian organisations already own: EDRMS and CRM/ERP integrations, Dynamics 365, third-party APIs and staged legacy modernisation without a big-bang rewrite. Senior engineers map the estate first, then deliver integrations on a fixed scope with staging from week one, so a single failure never takes the whole programme down.
Integrations with electronic document and records management systems, including bulk migration of records with retention metadata intact, verified by reconciliation before any legacy store is retired.
Overlays on top of CRM and ERP platforms, D365 experience included, that put operational screens ahead of the record so staff work without leaving their flow.
Production integrations with external APIs: authentication, retry and rate-limit behaviour, contract versioning and monitoring, so a partner outage degrades gracefully and your workflow keeps running.
Legacy platforms retired incrementally behind routing seams, one capability at a time. The old system keeps running until each replacement has proven itself under real traffic.
Synchronisation layers with idempotent writes, deduplication and reconciliation that guarantee each record lands exactly once across systems, even when networks fail halfway through a batch.
Before touching legacy code, we pin down current behaviour with characterisation tests, so modernisation can prove the replacement does what the old system actually did.
Window: 4-12 weeks
Team: 1-2 integration eng
Complexity: M-L
Indicative only. A fixed price follows a free scope review.
Get a fixed quoteWe capture what the current systems actually do, including undocumented behaviour staff rely on, and encode it as executable tests that survive into the replacement.
We design contracts, queues, ownership and failure behaviour up front, so every integration has one clear place to reconcile when upstream systems disagree.
New capabilities run beside the old ones with automated reconciliation comparing outputs. Nothing is promoted until the gates show both systems agree record for record.
Cutovers happen during normal operation behind routing switches, with rollback rehearsed beforehand. Business keeps running; there is no weekend where the system goes dark.
Documentation, runbooks and reconciliation reports transfer with the system, plus a working session so your team can operate, monitor and extend every integration independently.
Modernisations delivered as overlays across an application portfolio with no business freeze windows. Every cutover ran during normal hours, gated by automated reconciliation and backed by rehearsed rollback.
Records migrated into EDRMS platforms with retention and disposition metadata preserved, reconciled record for record before decommissioning, so compliance obligations transferred with the documents.
Multi-decade engineering drawings registered and linked before defect mapping began on industrial assets, giving inspectors a verifiable lineage from scanned archive to live defect record.
More evidence in the delivery history and the complete 756-engagement register.
Operations and deliverables conform to the cross-cutting standards below, and every integration runs under documented change control with acceptance gates and least-privilege credentials from day one.
Operations and deliverables run under a documented management system aligned with ISO/IEC 27001:2022. The controls shape scoping, review, change management and evidence capture on every engagement.
Australia: Governs every Australian engagement, including hosting decisions and data residency.
Canada: Governs every Canadian engagement, including hosting decisions and data residency.
Quality management aligned with ISO 9001 governs scoping, review gates, acceptance criteria and handover, so every deliverable passes the same documented checks.
Australia: Applies to delivery for Australian clients across all service lines.
Canada: Applies to delivery for Canadian clients across all service lines.
Personal information handled in Australian engagements is processed in line with the Australian Privacy Principles, with access controls and data-handling rules carried through every environment.
Australia: Applies to all Australian engagements and to data processed on behalf of Australian clients.
Personal information handled in Canadian engagements is processed in line with PIPEDA and applicable provincial law, including Quebec Law 25 where relevant.
Canada: Applies to all Canadian engagements, with Quebec Law 25 obligations observed where data or operations touch Quebec.
SOC 2-aligned controls are embedded in delivery: change management, access control, monitoring and evidence capture run on every engagement.
Australia: Evidence packs are available to Australian clients under NDA.
Canada: Evidence packs are available to Canadian clients under NDA.
Integrations ship through documented change control, with acceptance gates agreed with the client before go-live and parallel-run verification for migrations.
Australia: Record and document handling in Australian integrations follows the Australian Privacy Principles.
Canada: Record and document handling in Canadian integrations follows PIPEDA and, where applicable, Quebec Law 25.
Service accounts, API keys and middleware credentials are scoped least-privilege, stored in managed secret stores and rotated on schedule.
Australia: Credential handling for Australian systems follows the cross-cutting information security controls.
Canada: Credential handling for Canadian systems follows the cross-cutting information security controls.
References to standards describe alignment. Certification is claimed only where an accredited certificate is published on this page.
Yes. Characterisation tests first, then integrations behind stable contracts, so the legacy system keeps running while each piece of it is safely replaced or wrapped.
No. Cutovers run behind routing switches during normal operation with reconciliation gates and rehearsed rollback, so the business keeps trading while the switch happens.
Automated reconciliation compares records across systems continuously, and exactly-once sync layers with idempotent writes prevent duplicates. Discrepancies surface as reportable gate failures, never as silent drift.
Contracts are versioned and monitored, so breaking changes surface in test environments first. Adapters isolate partner quirks, keeping your internal integration surface stable and testable.